View Full Version : Top 10 Worst Things About 2142
TG
10th October 2006, 06:42 AM
http://www.desinc.net/bf2142_review
Yup yup yup!
Albereth
10th October 2006, 07:36 AM
Yep - me too agrees
stoke
10th October 2006, 09:25 AM
ROFFEL .. I love the way he blasts the freaking server browser windows. LOVERLY !
But .. the points before that are all moot because the game is designed to be balanced, except for the x3 the run distance thing.
CHECK THESE COMMENTS:
The Demo is a very bad representation of the game
I was very disappointed by the demo, it quite simply is not as much fun as the beta was.
I agree with alot of your points, especially about the static emplacements & the duplicate titans. I have never understood why they are still using the gamespy game browser ingame it is pretty awful.
I think the better gameplay will come out with the actual game when you can start getting the unlocks. The Beta, while full of bugs, had ranking & the resulting unlocks. Since the unlocks were really easy to get, in the first 16 hours of playing the beta I was able to get 8-9 unlocks, they quickly gave players a chance to customize their 'avatar'. Those included things like an infantry AA weapon, grenades detpaks etc... Once those are introduced they entire game changes, & at least during the beta it was far more enjoyable. There are hud enhancement unlocks as well, but they really only help if you are playing in a squad.
The running/stamina thing is due to the availability of unlocks that increase your stamina & another that increases your stamina regen. During the beta it made a world of difference when I chose to get the stamina unlocks.
It does seem like a mod for the game, personally though it looks like a mod I would be willing to pay for, like POE, FH or DC.
I have to admit I am not sold on the unlock thing, I liked the flexibility during the beta, but I cannot say if it would be better or worse if they were all available right from the start.
FeralBanana
10th October 2006, 10:09 AM
A couple of the points brought up are COMPLETELY valid, just don't really make for a good game... I mean, it's stupid to have weapons that completely annihilate everything on the map in 1/2 a second...
Why would we even bother playing then?! = /
rainy
10th October 2006, 10:16 AM
This guy may have a point on some things. But essentially what he wants is a game that is more UT than BF, with overpowered weapons, limitless ammo, built-in wallhacks. He is even whinging about friendly fire. Come on - every game has friendly fire, no matter what the setting.
Opinions are like... you know what.
TG
10th October 2006, 11:43 AM
Yeah, I can't say I agree with all that he says.
But obviously the demo is lacking somewhat - they should at least allow you to fiddle with some of the unlocks.
Albereth
10th October 2006, 11:51 AM
Let's hope there is never another game like UT. They did that enough thank you
rainy
10th October 2006, 12:03 PM
I don't mind UT at all. But if I want to play UT style, I'll play UT, thank you. Epic are better at it than Dice, thats for sure.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.